Who this guide helps
Dealers choosing an operating model
The short answer
Compare service promises and cash exposure together. Stocking may reduce a delivery dependency but introduces inventory, storage and damage risks; order-on-demand changes who carries them.
Practical workflow
List supplier lead-time assumptions, customer expectations, payment timing, returns and service ownership. Build a small scenario using verified costs and clearly labeled demand assumptions. Ask what happens when stock is unavailable or a customer cancels. Include display units and support labor separately.
What a useful handoff looks like
Request current supplier terms and test the workflow through a limited pilot. Record actual lead times and exceptions before scaling. Keep the scenario as planning, not a guaranteed profitability forecast.
Mistakes to avoid
Do not promise immediate delivery from stock you do not control or assume a supplier handles every return in an order-on-demand model.
Working example: fields to record
| Field | Illustrative entry — replace with your own facts |
|---|---|
| Cash exposure | Payment before customer collection |
| Service dependency | Supplier availability confirmation |
| Pilot measure | Actual order-to-delivery time |
Add your own entries; the example is illustrative. Keep sensitive information private.
Sources & further checks
Official references are starting points for further checks, not approval of a specific case, product or project.
Editorial note
AI-assisted editorial guidance; not expert certification.
Original editorial guidance. Examples are illustrative, not client cases, measured outcomes or promised services.
Legal and health-related decisions require appropriately qualified local professionals. This site is an independent editorial resource, not a law firm or medical provider.